TypeScript – Ontwikkelaars
Op zoek naar TypeScript-experts? Verken onze catalogus van top IT-bedrijven en freelancers die gespecialiseerd zijn in TypeScript-ontwikkeling. Vind vandaag nog de juiste leverancier voor uw project.
ITFB is een Russisch IT-bedrijf. Wij ontwikkelen en implementeren software.
- Min. project
- $3k+
Cascais · Sinds 2016 · 11-50 werknemers
We Build Products That Don’t Just Work — They Perform From MVPs to full-scale platforms — we craft software driven by real business metrics
- Min. project
- $5k+
- Uurtarief
- $40–$65/u
Wij van ITSpecial maken coole software en websites voor klanten. Onze klanten zijn Russische en buitenlandse bedrijven.....
- Min. project
- $10k+
Sinds 2025 · 1-10 werknemers
We zijn een jong team met bloed dat kookt, klaar om de beste projecten te doen en het maximum uit te persen....
- Min. project
- $100+
Ons bedrijf is gespecialiseerd in professionele web-ontwikkeling en heeft zich in de loop der jaren ...
- Min. project
- $3k+
- Min. project
- $10k+
Wij zijn gespecialiseerd in webproducten, waaronder websiteontwikkeling, online taakautomatisering...
- Min. project
- $3k+
Before you shortlist anyone
All calculatorsThe short answer
339 TypeScript companies are listed. 68% publish a minimum project budget; the median floor is $10k. Most work starts in the $10–20k range. Median published rate is $25/hr across 17 companies.
Best supplied: USA (55) · India (38) · Polen (18)
Recalculated 2026-10-19 from live profiles.
What it costs, by country
Each cell counts companies whose published minimum project budget falls in that band. Only countries with at least 5 listed companies appear.
| Country | under $3k | $3–10k | $10–20k | $20–30k | $30k+ | Median rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nederland1 | — | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| USA55Widest choice | 1 | 9 | 12 | 8 | 15 | — |
| India38 | — | 8 | 4 | 4 | 4 | — |
| Polen18 | — | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | — |
| Oekraïne16 | — | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | — |
| Verenigd Koninkrijk8 | — | 1 | 3 | 2 | — | — |
| Roemenië5 | — | 2 | 1 | — | — | — |
How this table is built
- Figures are minimum project budgets companies publish on their own profiles — the floor below which they decline work, not the price of a finished project.
- USD only. Companies quote in six currencies and averaging across them produces a number nobody charges.
- Budgets outside $300–$2,000,000 and rates outside $5–$500/hr are dropped as data-entry errors.
- A country needs 5 listed companies for a row, and 5 published rates before a median rate is shown.
What will your budget reach?
Move the slider. Every figure below is a count of companies whose published minimum project budget sits at or under that amount.
68 of 232 companies (29%) take projects at this size.
Where the entry thresholds sit
- under $3k
- 7
- $3–10k
- 61
- $10–20k
- 62
- $20–30k
- 50
- $30k+
- 52
Goes furthest in USA — 10 companies
This says who will engage, not what your scope should cost. A budget that reaches most of the market still buys very different things depending on what you are building.
Who is focused, and who has proved it
Horizontal: how concentrated a company is on TypeScript. Vertical: how much checkable evidence stands behind it. 59 of 339 companies are plotted — the rest have fewer than 2 evidence signals, so placing them would be guesswork.
- SoftMediaLabLeaders
- CSSChopperLeaders
- DashBouquet DevelopmentLeaders
- ElinextLeaders
- AnadeaLeaders
- RubyGarageLeaders
How a company is placed
- Focus is the inverse of how many categories a company claims, blended with the share of its portfolio tagged with this one. A firm listing three technologies is concentrated; a firm listing forty also appears here.
- Proven delivery adds published reviews (to 20), portfolio projects (to 25), Ahrefs Domain Rating (to 60) and years listed (to 10). Each is capped so no single signal carries a company to the top.
- Positions are relative to the other companies on this page: the median company sits at the centre of each axis, so a quadrant boundary means "ahead of half the companies listed here". Raw scores are in each bubble's tooltip.
- Deliberately excluded: the star rating, which sits in too narrow a band to separate anyone; the editorial rank, which is a hand-assigned sort weight; and paid verification, which does not move anything on this chart.
- Leaders:
- Concentrated on this work and with the record to show for it.
- Specialists:
- This is most of what they do, but the public evidence is still thin.
- Established generalists:
- A substantial track record, spread across many categories.
- Emerging:
- Building both focus and evidence.
Klantbeoordelingen over TypeScript
MiaoWebs
Malinovsky Digital Agency
Malinovsky Digital Agency proved to be a successful partner for our IT recruitment agency based in Poland. Their experience and expertise played an important role in expanding our client base in the local Polish market and in the global market in the IT sector. Their personalized approach resulted in a marketing strategy perfectly tailored to our company's needs. This led to a significant increase in organic traffic and provided us with both immediate results from advertising and long-term results from SEO efforts. As the CEO of KIAT, I was delighted with the careful attention to our project, such a clear choice of a successful strategy and the quick results. Malinovsky's SEO and PPC have helped our agency grow for over a year now.
Aksamit Projects
Alvera Solutions OÜ cooperated with Aksamit Projects on a number of development and delivery-related tasks. Throughout the collaboration, the Aksamit Projects team demonstrated a structured approach to work, strong technical competence, and a clear understanding of the project requirements. The scope of work included task planning, implementation, and ongoing coordination. All assigned tasks were completed in accordance with the agreed specifications, timelines, and quality standards. Communication was professional and consistent, which ensured smooth progress and timely decision-making during all project phases. Aksamit Projects proved to be a reliable and responsible partner, capable of efficiently handling assigned tasks and adapting to evolving project needs. We can confidently recommend Aksamit Projects for professional collaboration on technical and project-based engagements.
Portfolio projecten
Waarom Wadline vertrouwen
Wadline is een betrouwbaar platform voor het vinden van IT-bedrijven en bureaus. Wij helpen bedrijven weloverwogen beslissingen te nemen door geverifieerde reviews en transparante informatie.
Geverifieerde klantbeoordelingen
Elke review op Wadline wordt geverifieerd. We bevestigen de authenticiteit van klantfeedback door projectdetails, tijdlijnen en resultaten te controleren.
Datagestuurde rankings
Onze bedrijfsrankings zijn gebaseerd op data. Elk bedrijf wordt beoordeeld op expertise, ervaring, portfoliokwaliteit en klanttevredenheid.
Wereldwijd bereik
Wadline verbindt bedrijven wereldwijd met betrouwbare technologiepartners. Ons platform bevat bedrijven uit vele landen.
Volledige transparantie
Van geverifieerde reviews en portfolio's tot diensten en prijzen, Wadline biedt een compleet overzicht van elk bedrijf voor weloverwogen beslissingen.
We evalueren dienstverleners met een gestructureerde methodologie die klantinterviews, portfolio-analyse en marktaanwezigheidsbeoordeling combineert.
Meer over onze methodologie →Verken met AI
Krijg een AI-samenvatting van topbedrijven in deze categorie. Klik op een dienst om deze pagina te analyseren.